Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Tony J's avatar

The names of these right wing bodies are so innocuous sounding. As you have highlighted, there are so many affiliations it must be so hard keeping a track of. It's great to get a better understanding of the Australian context and links to these think tanks, or junk tanks as you describe them. But the very conservative nature and attitudes makes me wonder how influential they can be in the Australian context. The fact that they are established is no doubt of concern. With such a right wing agenda, I wonder about their ultimate appeal though. I guess some of the concern is the fact that they work in the shadows, so to speak.

I wonder about how they can be counterbalanced by opposing left leaning bodies in response? An appropriate political response? But it's hard to compete I suppose with significant fossil fuel money propping up these right wing groups.

Expand full comment
Andrew's avatar

Interesting, especially when backgrounded by the Munich Security Conference with Trump's Hegseth, Vance et al. plotting with Putin to throw Ukraine and Europe under a bus?

Further, it's shining light onto both Trump led Anglo right and the confused left, sorting the wheat from the chaff?

Question that should be asked eg. ARC, why are Anglo ultra conservatives &/or white Christian nationalists inc Fox's Abbott, Howard, Downer et al sharing talking points with Trump et al.?

As are the anti-imperialist left of Assange/Wikileaks, Kostakidis, Keating et al vs. Ukraine and Europe? Replicated and far worse in the UK, US, Hungary etc., but seem ignorant, to take moral, ethical and empathy bypasses?

Related to ARC, it's been alleged by Trudeau under oath that colleague of Howard, Abbott, Anderson et al, ie. Jordan Peterson; and also Murdoch-Fox's former presenter Tucker Carlson, are ‘Russian assets’.

https://www.vanityfair.com/hollywood/story/justin-trudeau-tucker-calrson-russian-propaganda

Expand full comment
2 more comments...

No posts