The Atlas Network has eugenicist roots
Australian Atlas Network operatives should distance themselves from the eugenics that is inherent to the history of that network of junktanks.
We don’t expect the free market’s ad men to understand their movement’s deep integration with eugenicist ideas. It is worth knowing that fact, however much they will deny the relevance of their origin stories.
Peter Kurti, of the Atlas Network’s Centre for Independent Studies, wrote an opinion piece for The Australian recently called “Citizenship based on rights can’t replace the glue of civil society.” There he posits “social cohesion” as more important than rights. He blames “multiculturalism” for the reluctance of Australians to volunteer. These are baseless tropes common to the Atlas Network, and also to Viktor Orbán’s junktank space where Kurti is a feature.
British investigative journalist Nafeez Ahmed has just published a book tracking the tight integration of the same American eugenics movement that fed the Nazi death camps into the “science” of free market economics. The integration of “former” Nazis and fellow travellers into the movement around libertarianism is made quite clear in his account. The same donors that fund the Atlas Network also funded the “science” of class and racial difference.
It is not surprising that a movement designed to serve the rich should emerge out of racist beliefs. The upper classes of the early 20th century tended to be eugenicist and many supported the Nazis. The 19th century Social Darwinist idea that success, in society or business, reflected genetic fitness never went away.
The Mont Pelerin Society (that later birthed the Atlas Network to act as the self-replicating advertising agency for its oligarch donors’ policy goals) was established in 1947 to fight the threat of communism. Property had to be protected from the masses. Keynesian government involvement in the market and society was just another form of theft for these economist-servants of the upper echelons.
At the same time, Ahmed explains, the proto-CIA was integrating former Nazi spies into the Western intelligence gathering circuit where they fostered anti-Soviet hysteria for their own purposes. William Casey was one of the key OSS figures in that era and later director of the CIA under Reagan.
Casey also worked with the creator of the Atlas Network Sir Antony Fisher, co-founding together Fisher’s first American junktank, the Manhattan Institute.(1)
Race, empire and capitalism have deeply intertwined roots. Part of the monumental global violence of the Cold War involved empires and capitalist forces rejecting the colonised people’s demand for freedom. One of the Atlas Network’s roles has been to deploy disgruntled local elites to foster a more convenient definition of “freedom” that protects the local (lighter skinned) aristocracy’s property, alongside the (foreign) corporations’ investments and profits.
The Cold War struggle against redistribution came to demarcate the “communist” enemy in any group that wanted equal rights. Old racisms were recast as factual detection of communist subversion. The Civil Rights movement was depicted by the propagandists entrenching privilege as a communist threat.
Many amongst the moneyed class in America belonged to the notorious John Birch Society through the 1950s into the 70s. Charles Koch, one of the key Atlas Network donors and strategists later in the century bought a lifetime membership. His father had been a founding member. Birch was an hysterical conspiracist organisation that fought communism but was also explicitly racist.
So the fact that key Atlas donors like the Mellon-Scaifes, Bradleys and Olins were also funding research to establish that “science” could shore up the Evolutionary Ladder is not surprising. They wanted the proof that Black people were genetically inferior.
It had the adjunct benefit of establishing that the White working class was inferior also.
Atlas junktanks and Rupert Murdoch, who was a junktank director at Atlas’s Cato Institute in the 90s, fostered the career and disseminated the writing of figures like Charles Murray who gave them the (discredited) science to fight “welfare.” There was no value in helping the poor, of any skin colour, if they were genetically trapped in their suffering.
Many of the same donors funded the transition of the race biology industry into the Islamophobia industry after 9/11. They needed a new enemy, now that Russia was White and Christian again. Creating a sense that there was an integral “clash of civilisations” with the Islamic “world” was as useful as the certainty that the Soviets were an existential threat and that Black people were genetically inferior.
Many of same figures and families continue to work now in this movement that gradually flipped Western society from a Keynesian understanding of political economy to a neoliberal one.
In the wake of the shooting of a CEO in New York, there have been many musings on the “ruthless arithmetic" of neoliberal capitalism, the implicit knowledge that some lives have no value for the shareholder.
The same old idea of the fungibility of the lower orders underpins the Atlas Network’s Institute of Public Affairs (IPA) hosting Jay Bhattacharya in Australia during the pandemic to promote his easily debunked research fighting public health measures. The massive death toll amongst (darker skinned) “essential workers” in the USA was a small price to pay for quarterly profit protection.
One of the reasons such tools argued that schools must remain open (despite the unwillingness to allow investment in the improvements that would make schools safer during a pandemic) is because the CEOs needed them as childminding.
Atlas Network junktanks fight any regulation that translates into making workplaces and products safer. Their workers, neighbours and customers can die if the shareholder is happy.
The demonisation of “welfare” by Atlas Network junktanks over the decades created the space for Alan Tudge’s threats towards the battlers in the rhetoric around Robodebt. It provides the context for the individual cases that Tudge had extracted and provided to “friendly” media to ruin the reputation of people complaining about the illegal program.
The rich are on tax strike, one of the Atlas Network’s key goals. Much of the common wealth that is collected is funnelled up to the investors in industries such as the weapons sector, or just gifted as Jobkeeper overpayments were. This limits the money available for social goods.
That means that Kurti’s emphasis on volunteering becomes even more important. If the oligarchs have ensured that there is very little money available for the community, we need volunteers to compensate. The neoliberal project also partly works to fan up “family values” because they need women to provide the care for the family unit that they have prevented society making available.
And the enemy must be depicted as the Other. Whether it is the Black rights activist who must be portrayed as “communist” or the multicultural society that Kurti singles out as undermining “social cohesion,” the enemy cannot be the oligarch whose propaganda has enabled making our lives more precarious. Viktor Orbán is the guiding light of those who want ethnostates, the only way they can imagine cohesion.
The alleged socialism of anyone who wants their rights protected continues in random allegations of “socialism” by Atlas Network operatives. They rant against the trope of “woke” which they claim is the product of “cultural marxism,” a fevered furphy that is both an allegation of socialism and an antisemitic slur.(2)
The roots of the racism and desired inequality that underpinned the creation of the Atlas Network continue in its talking points now. We need to help those around us see those ghostly echoes for the dangerous entrenchment of privilege that they are.
Atlas’s Manhattan Institute now has Christopher Rufo as a Senior Fellow. This is the man who took the academic legal study of residual racist laws from past eras - Critical Race Theory - and turned it into a frenzied effort by the MAGA base to prevent the teaching of accurate history in schools. His work to return American education to a White mythologised version of the nation’s history has been very effective at mobilising - and distracting - the radicalised base. Rufo followed up that work with a second toxic campaign to erase the existence of LGBTQIA+ people from education. Rufo is one of the connections between the acknowledged Atlas junktanks and Viktor Orbán’s junktank sphere.
Jack Posobiec was a 2019 Fellow at Atlas’s Claremont Institute. Claremont was a more reputable right-wing junktank but has become radicalised. It has many personnel connections with an “extremist fraternal order” with Christofascist goals. It hosted senior personnel connected to the plot behind Donald Trump’s insurrection attempt in 2021. It appeared to be promoting a new civil war. Jack Posobiec has written a book that labels anyone not belonging to the radicalised Right a “socialist” threat and an Unhuman. The violence likely to follow that label has clear historical precedents.
I struggle to understand the meaning of cultural Marxism. Marx was an economist wrong on some things right on others. He posited that capitalists are so greedy they will kill off the spending power of the bulk of people. They are lemmings in other words. The right wing would have D P Moynihan rolling in his grave. He was wrong. You can have your own facts. As for Rufo, he’s simply sinister.
Good overview, much to unpack and can add some tit bits, to this wicked web and as described by Nancy MacLean in ‘Democracy in Chains’ a long game…..
One wouldn't ascribe that much influence to Orbán when he has had media and expertise in support of his electoral opportunism, ie. following existing culture and demographics in Hungary; many old people and Roma.
Exemplified by his Fidesz party's ‘gypsy crime’ platform which then later via Netanyahu, segued into the imported ‘Soros conspiracy’; Orban's own grandmother was gypsy Heritage and when asked he said ‘you need different coloured balls to play pool’, suggesting strength in diversity?
Mont Pelerin includes the Koch's muse ‘segregation economist’ James Buchanan, a good old boy. For examples of John Birch tactics see Kochonomics Tea Party astroturf grass roots movement and the present targeting of school committees, curricula and syllabi; in Congress it’s the ‘Freedom Caucus’.
On Charles Murray and the ‘bell curve’, it crosses over to the white nationalist Tanton Network and the ‘intellectual dark web’ that denigrates woke, universities, women etc. to publicly attract younger males, but in fact eugenics or social-Darwinism for an audience of middle aged and older white males (like the ‘silent majority’).
Meanwhile, according to Media Matters US 2022, Fox News had employed friend of the late John Tanton (admired white Australia policy), ie. Brit born Peter Brimelow, friend and former colleague of Abbott's Danube Inst. boss and Quadrant correspondent John O'Sullivan, and reported directly to Murdoch (but stood down same time as Tucker Carlson).
Koch anti-Covid measures Jay Bhattacharya, while RFK gets the attention, former has already been appointed director of NIH National Institutes of Health…….
On taxes, this is where the anti-immigrant Tanton Network come in sharing social-Darwinism with Koch Network, as one has been targeted by a local Australian Tanton outlet in a particular media comment section. On anything immigrant and population, or supposed linked negative issues, using techniques of climate science deniers (avoid future trends, focus on single factor etc.), aggro of FoxNews, Scientology special ops and Roy Cohn (assisted McCarthy, Trump & Murdoch).
They practise Orwellian denial vs fact that Australia is ageing and needs immigration, both modest permanent and especially high temporary churn over of international students etc. as ‘net financial contributors’ to keep budgets healthy with tax revenue to support more retirees.
In response there is open misrepresentation of data, dog whistling, trashing universities with science, woke etc. and using high profile economists to present tricky analysis, promoted further by data, science, research process, finance and economics illiterate media……
Opens the door for old eugenics tropes around fossil fueled ‘limits to growth’ eg. degrowth, carrying capacity, sustainability etc. and even the untested MMT Modern Monetary Theory.
A sophisticated long game to avoid taxes by <1% and eventually pare down the state and public services, even if it means potentially crashing an economy and/or government (See Liz Truss & Kochonomics).